Diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors: a decision-making analysis among European sarcoma centers
Naimi, Ali Putora, Paul Martin Rothermundt, Christian Digklia, Antonia Asencio, Jose Manuel Bonvalot, Sylvie Bösch, Florian Desai, Anant Durrani, Amer James Gutman, Haim
Naimi, Ali
Putora, Paul Martin
Rothermundt, Christian
Digklia, Antonia
Asencio, Jose Manuel
Bonvalot, Sylvie
Bösch, Florian
Desai, Anant
Durrani, Amer James
Gutman, Haim
Abstract
Objectives: Lipomatous soft-tissue tumors present a diagnostic burden. The aim of this work was to compare standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the diagnostic management of lipomatous soft-tissue tumors among European academic centers.
Methods: Experts of the Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were asked for their SOPs in the diagnosis of adipocytic soft-tissue tumors in an otherwise healthy patient. The answers were converted to decision trees and subsequently compared using the objective consensus methodology. Mediastinal and retroperitoneal lipomatous tumors were excluded from the analysis.
Results: The highest consensus (93%) among fourteen institutions was noted for evaluation with core needle biopsy (CNB) as SOP for lipomatous tumors located deep in tissue exceeding 7 cm and tumor-associated symptoms. Evaluation of heterogeneous features on imaging by CNB usually showed a consensus rate of at least 75%. Consensus was less likely for lipomatous tumors without symptoms or heterogeneous features. In these settings, CNB and follow-up were almost equally recommended. For lipomatous tumors smaller than 3 cm, without growth or symptoms, no localization in the trunk, and homogeneous imaging features, a consensus rate of 71% was achieved for follow-up.
Conclusions: SOPs for diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors varied despite their geographical proximity. The highest consensus for biopsy was for deep large tumors with associated symptoms. For follow-up, consensus was shown for small homogenous tumors outside the trunk, without growth or symptoms. Consensus on resection involved homogeneous deeply located small tumors outside the trunk with growth and symptoms.
Critical relevance statement: This study identifies the decision-making criteria with the highest consensus rate among participating academic sarcoma centers in diagnosing lipomatous tumors: tumors located deep in the tissue, a tumor size exceeding 7 cm, and associated symptoms emerge as pivotal criteria.
Key points: Standard operating procedures for diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors among fourteen sarcoma centers were analyzed. Identified diagnostic criteria are: imaging features, size, growth, symptoms, superficial and trunk location. The highest consensus concerned recommending biopsies for deep tumors > 7 cm with associated symptoms.
MIDER Authors
Date
2025-06-14
Type
Article
Subject
Sarcoma, Reference standards, Soft tissue neoplasms
Collections
Citation
Naimi A, Putora PM, Rothermundt C, Digklia A, Asencio JM, Bonvalot S, Bösch F, Desai A, Durrani AJ, Gutman H, Hompes D, Jakob J, Knoefel WT, Pennacchioli E, Rutkowski P, van Houdt WJ, van Leeuwen BL, Waelti S, Fischer TS, Markart S, Wildermuth S, Dietrich TJ. Diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors: a decision-making analysis among European sarcoma centers. Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02012-7.
Journal / Source Title
Insights into Imaging
DOI
10.1186/s13244-025-02012-7
PMID
40515886
Publisher
Springer
Publisher’s URL
https://link.springer.com/journal/13244