Publication

Is nitazene-related mortality underestimated? Findings from an in vivo and ex vivo rat study and pharmacoepidemiological analysis of coroner-reported deaths

Chen, Shuoqi
Aldabergenov, Daniyar
Alotaibi, Khalid S
Holland, Adam
Moore, Robert
Wood, Rebecca
Hudson, Simon
Milton, Holly
Menzies, Eleanor
Parks, Claire
... show 5 more
Abstract
Introduction: Nitazenes are potent synthetic opioids. Following reports questioning their post-mortem stability, nitazene-related deaths may have been underestimated in the United Kingdom. We investigated this using a rat model and regional coronial data, and also present national pharmacoepidemiologic trends in nitazene-related deaths. Method: In vivo/ex vivo study: Anaesthetised Wistar rats (n = 12) received intravenous nitazene (metonitazene, N-desethyl isotonitazene, or N-pyrrolidino etonitazene). Rats were euthanised 15 min post-administration if cardiorespiratory arrest had not already occurred (n = 8). Blood and urine were collected, with repeat blood samples taken following cadaver refrigeration (4 °C) for one week. All samples were immediately frozen (-80 °C). Upon defrosting, half were analysed immediately by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy with half stored at 4 °C for 1 month before analysis. Pharmacoepidemiology: Nitazene deaths were extracted from the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality in March 2025 along with all deaths from the Birmingham & Solihull coronial area (2019-2023). Descriptive analyses were conducted along with exponential smoothing models to compare observed and forecasted deaths in Birmingham & Solihull in 2023. Results: In vivo/ex vivo study: A small fraction of the nitazene detected in the immediate post-mortem blood sample remained in the post-mortem day 7 blood sample that had been refrigerated for 1 month. Pharmacoepidemiology: In Birmingham and Solihull, non-nitazene drug deaths rose 33% in 2023 compared to 2019-2022 (predicted n = 107, actual n = 142). By March 2025, 285 deaths with nitazene detections were reported to the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality, with small clusters in 2021 (n = 23) and 2022 (n = 15) before markedly increasing in 2023 (n = 131). Twelve nitazenes were detected with the predominant nitazene shifting over time (2021: isotonitazene; 2022: N-pyrrolidino etonitazene; 2023: N-desethyl isotonitazene). Coroners deemed nitazenes causative in 90% of cases (n = 256/285). Conclusions: Nitazene-related deaths have increased in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, and may have been underestimated due to post-mortem instability. Urgent public health action is required to reduce nitazene-related harms.
MIDER Authors
Affiliations
Citations
Google Scholar:
Altmetric:
Date
2026-02-08
Type
Article
Collections
Citation
Chen S, Aldabergenov D, Alotaibi KS, Holland A, Moore R, Wood R, Hudson S, Milton H, Menzies E, Parks C, Lawson AJ, Harris M, Singer M, Dyson A, Copeland CS. Is nitazene-related mortality underestimated? Findings from an in vivo and ex vivo rat study and pharmacoepidemiological analysis of coroner-reported deaths. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2026 Apr;64(4):311-323. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2025.2601141. Epub 2026 Feb 8.
Journal / Source Title
Publisher’s statement
Note / Copyright