Loading...
Effectiveness of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income countries : multicentre randomised controlled trial
Puschner, Bernd ; Nakku, Juliet ; Hiltensperger, Ramona ; Wolf, Philip ; Adler Ben-Dor, Indar ; Bugeiga, Faith ; Charles, Ashleigh ; Gai Meir, Lion ; Garber-Epstein, Paula ; Goldfarb, Yael ... show 10 more
Puschner, Bernd
Nakku, Juliet
Hiltensperger, Ramona
Wolf, Philip
Adler Ben-Dor, Indar
Bugeiga, Faith
Charles, Ashleigh
Gai Meir, Lion
Garber-Epstein, Paula
Goldfarb, Yael
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some trials have evaluated peer support for people with mental ill health in high-income, mainly English-speaking countries, but the quality of the evidence is weak. AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of UPSIDES peer support in high-, middle- and low-income countries. METHOD: This pragmatic multicentre parallel-group wait-list randomised controlled trial (registration: ISRCTN26008944) with three measurement points (baseline and 4 and 8 months) took place at six study sites: two in Germany, and one each in Uganda, Tanzania, Israel and India. Participants were adults with long-standing severe mental health conditions. Outcomes were improvements in social inclusion (primary) and empowerment, hope, recovery, health and social functioning (secondary). Participants allocated to the intervention group were offered UPSIDES peer support. RESULTS: Of the 615 participants (305 intervention group), 337 (54.8%) identified as women. The average age was 38.3 (s.d. = 11.2) years, and the mean illness duration was 14.9 (s.d. = 38.4) years. Those allocated to the intervention group received 6.9 (s.d. = 4.2) peer support sessions on average. Intention-to-treat analysis showed effects on two of the three subscales of the Social Inclusion Scale, Empowerment Scale and HOPE Scale. Per-protocol analysis with participants who had received three or more intervention sessions also showed an effect on the Social Inclusion Scale total score (β = 0.18, P = 0.031, 95% CI: 0.02-0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Peer support has beneficial impacts on social inclusion, empowerment and hope among people with severe mental health conditions across diverse settings. As social isolation is a key driver of mental ill health, and empowerment and hope are both crucial for recovery, peer support can be recommended as an effective component of mental healthcare. Peer support has the potential to move global mental health closer towards a recovery- and rights-based orientation.
MIDER Authors
Affiliations
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
2025
Type
Article
Subject
Files
Loading...
Puschner 2025 1-9.pdf
Adobe PDF, 867.27 KB
Citation
Puschner, B., Nakku, J., Hiltensperger, R., Wolf, P., Adler Ben-Dor, I., Bugeiga, F., Charles, A., Gai Meir, L., Garber-Epstein, P., Goldfarb, Y., et al. (2025). Effectiveness of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income countries: multicentre randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2025.10299.
