Bipolar at-risk criteria: an examination of which clinical features have optimal utility for identifying youth at risk of early transition from depression to bipolar disorders
Scott, Jan ; Marwaha, Steven ; Ratheesh, Aswin ; Macmillan, Iain ; Yung, Alison R ; Morriss, Richard K ; Morriss, Richard K. ; Hickie, Ian B ; Bechdolf, Andreas
Scott, Jan
Marwaha, Steven
Ratheesh, Aswin
Macmillan, Iain
Yung, Alison R
Morriss, Richard K
Morriss, Richard K.
Hickie, Ian B
Bechdolf, Andreas
Abstract
A clinical and research challenge is to identify which depressed youth are at risk of "early transition to bipolar disorders (ET-BD)." This 2-part study (1) examines the clinical utility of previously reported BD at-risk (BAR) criteria in differentiating ET-BD cases from unipolar depression (UP) controls; and (2) estimates the Number Needed to Screen (NNS) for research and general psychiatry settings. Fifty cases with reliably ascertained, ET-BD I and II cases were matched for gender and birth year with 50 UP controls who did not develop BD over 2 years. We estimated the clinical utility for finding true cases and screening out non-cases for selected risk factors and their NNS. Using a convenience sample (N = 80), we estimated the NNS when adjustments were made to account for data missing from clinical case notes. Sub-threshold mania, cyclothymia, family history of BD, atypical depression symptoms and probable antidepressant-emergent elation, occurred significantly more frequently in ET-BD youth. Each of these "BAR-Depression" criteria demonstrated clinical utility for screening out non-cases. Only cyclothymia demonstrated good utility for case finding in research settings; sub-threshold mania showed moderate utility. In the convenience sample, the NNS for each criterion ranged from ~4 to 7. Cyclothymia showed the optimum profile for case finding, screening and NNS in research settings. However, its presence or absence was only reported in 50% of case notes. Future studies of ET-BD instruments should distinguish which criteria have clinical utility for case finding vs screening. © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
MIDER Authors
Affiliations
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
2016-11-21
Type
Article
Subject
Collections
Citation
Scott J, Marwaha S, Ratheesh A, Macmillan I, Yung AR, Morriss R, Hickie IB, Bechdolf A. Bipolar At-Risk Criteria: An Examination of Which Clinical Features Have Optimal Utility for Identifying Youth at Risk of Early Transition From Depression to Bipolar Disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jul 1;43(4):737-744. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw154.
