Value of standard personality assessments in informing clinical decision-making in a medium secure unit
Duggan, Conor Mason, Lauren Banerjee, Penny J. M. Milton, John
Duggan, Conor
Mason, Lauren
Banerjee, Penny J. M.
Milton, John
Abstract
Background: Assessing those with personality disorder for treatment in secure settings is known to be unsatisfactory. Aim: To examine the utility of a standardised assessment of offenders with personality disorder referred for treatment in secure care in a naturalistic study. Method: A consecutive series of 89 men were assessed with a battery of four recommended instruments measuring personality and risk. Decisions on whether or not to admit were based on a multidisciplinary discussion informed by these assessments. Results: Of the 89 comprehensively assessed referrals, 60 (67%) were offered admission. High scores on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (especially on Factor I) was the only measure that was associated with rejection. Of 44 patients discharged, 29 (66%) failed to complete treatment; none of the pre-admission assessments distinguished 'completers' from 'non-completers'. Although skills were acquired on the unit, follow-up of 24 men in the community showed that this had only a marginal effect on re-offending rate (58%). Conclusions: Current recommended assessment methods appear unsatisfactory in identifying those who either (a) complete treatment or (b) benefit from treatment. Our results throw doubt on their value.
MIDER Authors
Affiliations
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
2007
Type
Article
Collections
Citation
Duggan, C., Mason, L., Banerjee, P. J. M. & Milton, J. (2007). Value of standard personality assessments in informing clinical decision-making in a medium secure unit. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190 (SUPPL. 49), pp.s15-s19.