Social connectedness in adults with mental disorders: ecological validation of a conceptual framework for novel complex interventions
Hare-Duke, Laurie Dening, Tom Slade, Mike
Hare-Duke, Laurie
Dening, Tom
Slade, Mike
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social connectedness interventions may improve the clinical outcomes and personal recovery of adults with mental disorders but many interventions lack a clear theory-base and show limited effectiveness. AIM: To evaluate the validity of a newly developed conceptual framework (the CIVIC framework: Closeness, Identity, Valued relationships, Involvement and Cared for and accepted) to function as the theory-base for novel social connectedness-based mental health interventions. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with adults with diagnostically heterogeneous mental disorders (nā=ā13) and mental health professionals (nā=ā9). Participants reported their social connectedness experiences, their views on the CIVIC framework and potential targets for new interventions. Sequential inductive and deductive thematic analyses were used. Data quality was assessed through respondent validation.: RESULTS: Both inductive and deductive analyses provided validation of the CIVIC framework. Additional themes of Stigma and Connectedness beyond social relationships were identified in the inductive analysis. Candidate interventions to target each CIVIC domain were identified.CONCLUSIONSThe CIVIC framework demonstrates ecological validity and can therefore serve as the theory-base for the development of novel social connectedness-based interventions. This study indicates that interventions would be most effective when they incorporate evidence-based approaches which target each of the categories described by the CIVIC framework.
MIDER Authors
Affiliations
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
2021
Type
Subject
Citation
Hare-Duke, L., Dening, T., Oliveira, D., Dewa, R. & Slade, M. (2021). Social connectedness in adults with mental disorders: ecological validation of a conceptual framework for novel complex interventions. Journal of Mental Health, 30(3), pp. 333-340.