Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

Home-based narrowband UVB, topical corticosteroid or combination for children and adults with vitiligo: HI-Light Vitiligo three-arm RCT

Akram, Perways
Ravenscroft, Jane C
Rogers, Andy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews suggest that narrowband ultraviolet B light combined with treatments such as topical corticosteroids may be more effective than monotherapy for vitiligo., OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topical corticosteroid monotherapy compared with (1) hand-held narrowband ultraviolet B light monotherapy and (2) hand-held narrowband ultraviolet B light/topical corticosteroid combination treatment for localised vitiligo., DESIGN: Pragmatic, three-arm, randomised controlled trial with 9 months of treatment and a 12-month follow-up., SETTING: Sixteen UK hospitals - participants were recruited from primary and secondary care and the community., PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children (aged >= 5 years) with active non-segmental vitiligo affecting 75% of the expected treatment protocol were more likely to achieve treatment success. Over 40% of participants had lost treatment response after 1 year with no treatment. Grade 3 or 4 erythema was experienced by 62 participants (12%) (three of whom were using the dummy) and transient skin thinning by 13 participants (2.5%) (two of whom were using the placebo). We observed no serious adverse treatment effects. For combination treatment compared with topical corticosteroids, the unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 2328.56 (adjusted 1932) per additional successful treatment (from an NHS perspective)., LIMITATIONS: Relatively high loss to follow-up limits the interpretation of the trial findings, especially during the post-intervention follow-up phase., CONCLUSION: Hand-held narrowband ultraviolet B light plus topical corticosteroid combination treatment is superior to topical corticosteroids alone for treatment of localised vitiligo. Combination treatment was relatively safe and well tolerated, but was effective in around one-quarter of participants only. Whether or not combination treatment is cost-effective depends on how much decision-makers are willing to pay for the benefits observed., FUTURE WORK: Development and testing of new vitiligo treatments with a greater treatment response and longer-lasting effects are needed., TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17160087., FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 64. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Citation
Batchelor, J.M., Thomas, K.S., Akram, P., Azad, J., Bewley, A., Chalmers, J.R., Cheung, S.T., Duley, L., Eleftheriadou, V., Ellis, R., Ferguson, A., Goulding, J.M., Haines, R.H., Hamad, H., Ingram, J.R., Laguda, B., Leighton, P., Levell, N., Makrygeorgou, A., Meakin, G.D., Millington, A., Ogboli, M., Rajasekaran, A., Ravenscroft, J.C., Rogers, A., Sach, T.H., Santer, M., Stainforth, J., Tan, W., Wahie, S., White, J., Whitton, M.E., Williams, H.C., Wright, A. and Montgomery, A.A. (2020) 'Home-based narrowband UVB, topical corticosteroid or combination for children and adults with vitiligo: HI-Light Vitiligo three-arm RCT', Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 24(64), pp. 1-128. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta24640.
Journal / Source Title
DOI
PMID
Publisher
The National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher’s URL
Publisher’s statement
Note / Copyright