A test of methodology intended to assist detection of aggressive offence paralleling behaviour within secure settings
Daffern, Michael Howells, Kevin Mannion, Aisling Tonkin, Matthew
Daffern, Michael
Howells, Kevin
Mannion, Aisling
Tonkin, Matthew
Abstract
Purpose. Treatments and risk assessments determined by the offence paralleling behaviour (OPB) framework appear to have found a place in practice well ahead of empirical support and conceptual clarity. Although the framework is intuitively appealing its inappropriate use may have profound negative implications for patients. Incapacitation and unnecessary treatments may be demanded when observed behaviours are interpreted as evidence of persistent pathology related to previous patterns of criminal offending. Conversely, behaviours occurring within institutions that are not topographically similar but that fall within the same response class and do represent the continuation of problematic patterns of behaviour may be ignored if observers are not sensitive to the possibility that problem behaviours, albeit muted, may persist within institutions. Methods. This paper presents a study examining the similarity of personality disordered patients' violent index acts with their aggressive behaviour during hospitalization. Results. Results revealed evidence of cross situational similarity for some but not all aggressive behaviours. Conclusion. These results provide support for the OPB framework. However, the lack of similarity on a significant number of incidents indicates a need for thorough, structured analysis to determine whether an aggressive behaviour observed in an institution parallels violent acts preceding incarceration. © 2009 The British Psychological Society.
MIDER Authors
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
2009
Type
Article
Subject
Behaviour, High security facilities, Personality disorders
Collections
Citation
Daffern, M., Howells, K., Mannion, A. & Tonkin, M. (2009). A test of methodology intended to assist detection of aggressive offence paralleling behaviour within secure settings. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14 (2), pp.213-226.