The impact of the mental health treatment requirement (MHTR) service on psychological distress, mental health recovery-related quality of life, and shame of individuals convicted of a criminal offence
Griffiths, Chris Walker, Kate Coelho, Liv Pinto, Regina Sarai, Jasmine Andrew, Megan Hopkins-Young, Olivia Giddings, Laura Jiang, Harmony House, Elliott
Griffiths, Chris
Walker, Kate
Coelho, Liv
Pinto, Regina
Sarai, Jasmine
Andrew, Megan
Hopkins-Young, Olivia
Giddings, Laura
Jiang, Harmony
House, Elliott
Abstract
Background: The Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR) is a court sentencing option for individuals convicted of a criminal offence when there is a link between their mental health and offending which requires community-based treatment. To improve mental health and reduce reoffending, the MHTR service seeks to understand service users’ needs and goals and provides appropriate psychological therapy and connection with supportive community services. Aims: This study investigated the impact of an MHTR service on service users’ psychological distress, mental health recovery-related quality of life, and shame. Methods: The study design was open-label and did not have a control. Measures used were Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-34), Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), and Experience of Shame Scale (ESS). Participants: Twenty-one MHTR service user participants, thirteen males (62%) and eight females (38%). The ages ranged from 19 to 66 years, with an average age of 37 years. Results: At the end of the MHTR the CORE-34 and ReQol-20 scores significantly improved, with large effect sizes; all four CORE-34 domains (including “risk”) significantly improved. There was a significant improvement in ESS overall score with a moderate effect size; all three ESS domains significantly improved. CORE-34 reliable improvement was 76% and ReQoL-20 reliable improvement was 57%. CORE-34 remission rate was 24%. Conclusions: Improvements on the ReQoL-20 indicate the positive impact of MHTR on the individual’s mental health recovery, real-world functioning, and quality of life. CORE-34 improvements indicate a positive impact on reducing psychological distress and risk, which is associated with reducing reoffending. Improvements on the ESS indicate the positive impact of MHTR on reducing shame-related distress which is associated with reduced self-criticism, anger, and antisocial traits. Further research required has been identified. Evidence indicates that MHTR is effective in meeting its goals and should be appropriately resourced to meet demands.
MIDER Authors
Citations
Altmetric:
Date
2025-08
Type
Article
Subject
Mental Health Recovery, Shame, Offenders
Citation
Griffiths C, Walker K, Coelho L, Pinto R, Sarai J, Andrew M, Hopkins-Young O, Giddings L, Jiang H, House E, Pereira Cunha M. The impact of the Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR) service on psychological distress, mental health recovery-related quality of life, and shame of individuals convicted of a criminal offence. Psychology. 2025;16:965‑981.